FOS decisions / Ate Insurance
Ate Insurance
Financial Ombudsman Service final decisions, reproduced verbatim from the FOS published decisions register.
Decisions
6
Upheld
1
Not upheld
5
Avg redress
£175
Upheld complaints (1)
Not-upheld complaints (5)
The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited
DRN-6311100Under CIDRA 2012, a consumer must take reasonable care not to misrepresent material facts when applying for insurance, and an insurer can decline a claim if the misrepresentation is qualifying (i.e., the insurer would not have offered the p
Not upheldSettlego Solutions Limited
DRN-6100798A payment processor providing virtual IBAN services to corporate clients is not responsible for monitoring those clients' customer accounts or preventing scams involving funds sent to those accounts.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6241829
An insurer is responsible for delays and defects only in repairs carried out by repairers it instructed, not those selected by the consumer.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6137262
An insurer is not liable for pre-existing defects unrelated to the insured event, and lost rental income is only payable when the property is genuinely unfit to live in due to the insured damage.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6239129
An insurer must replace a damaged appliance with one of the same or similar make and technical specification, but need not provide an identical or superior model.
Not upheld