FOS decisions / Endowment
Endowment
Financial Ombudsman Service final decisions, reproduced verbatim from the FOS published decisions register.
Decisions
7
Upheld
4
Not upheld
3
Avg redress
£167
Upheld complaints (4)
Phoenix Life Limited
DRN-6257827A firm must provide adequate service and clear communication when delivering financial information, particularly when changing service methods without notice.
UpheldRedress £50Decision DRN-6246519
Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, goods supplied under a contract must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and as described; a used car priced at £35,000 should be expected to offer reasonable durability without serious issues de
UpheldDecision DRN-6097548
Goods supplied under a hire purchase agreement must be of satisfactory quality as defined by the Consumer Rights Act 2015, taking into account the age, mileage, and price of the car.
UpheldDecision DRN-5955988
A car financed under a consumer credit agreement must be of satisfactory quality, and where repairs are unsuccessful the consumer is entitled to reject the goods and recover payments with a deduction for fair usage.
UpheldRedress £250
Not-upheld complaints (3)
Revolut Ltd
DRN-6318646A consumer who actively opts into a free trial promotion with clear terms about automatic conversion to paid subscription after the trial period cannot recover fees if they fail to cancel before the trial ends.
Not upheldHSBC UK Bank
DRN-6090137Banks must comply with legal and regulatory obligations regarding account monitoring and suspicious activity review, even if this causes inconvenience to the customer.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6091853
A supplier of goods under a conditional sale agreement is liable for breach of the satisfactory quality term under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, but is only required to refund costs directly incurred as a result of the defective goods, not
Not upheld