FOS decisions / Etf
Etf
Financial Ombudsman Service final decisions, reproduced verbatim from the FOS published decisions register.
Decisions
5
Upheld
0
Not upheld
5
Avg redress
—
Not-upheld complaints (5)
Decision DRN-6291846
Claims under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act are subject to the six-year limitation period under the Limitation Act 1980, running from when the loss occurred, and Section 140A unfair credit relationship claims require evidence that th
Not upheldMar 2026Revolut Ltd
DRN-6099943Payment service providers must take proportionate steps to prevent fraud, but customers who proceed with payments despite adequate warnings and questioning bear some responsibility for their losses.
Not upheldMitsubishi HC Capital UK PLC
DRN-6175553A lender must perform proportionate checks to understand whether a borrower can make payments in a sustainable manner, but if further checks would have still shown affordability, the lending is not irresponsible.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6202353
A firm has properly processed withdrawals when it returns funds matching the account balance at the time of withdrawal request, even if those funds are distributed across multiple transfers.
Not upheldHiFX Europe Limited
DRN-6250327A payment service provider is not liable for incorrect beneficiary details entered by the user if it processes the payment as instructed and provides adequate confirmation documentation.
Not upheld