FOS decisions / Insurance Pricing & Renewal
Insurance Pricing & Renewal
Financial Ombudsman Service final decisions, reproduced verbatim from the FOS published decisions register.
Decisions
23
Upheld
4
Not upheld
19
Avg redress
£165
Upheld complaints (4)
Decision DRN-6259287
Insurers must treat vulnerable customers fairly and take their support needs into account when providing service.
UpheldRedress £100Apr 2026Xbridge Limited
DRN-5920936Insurers must provide clear, fair and not misleading information about renewal terms, including what constitutes a change that could affect the renewal price.
UpheldRedress £100Mar 2026Decision DRN-6248839
A supplier of goods under a hire purchase agreement must ensure goods are of satisfactory quality, including durability, appearance and finish, as required by the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
UpheldAXA Insurance UK Plc
DRN-6230346An insurer has no obligation to renew a policy, but must not provide false reasons for non-renewal.
UpheldRedress £100
Not-upheld complaints (19)
Decision DRN-6192605
Insurance pricing is a commercial judgment for insurers to make; the FOS cannot determine fair prices but can check if customers have been treated fairly and consistently.
Not upheldMay 2026Decision DRN-6303245
An insurer that is signed up to the Claims and Underwriting Exchange (CUE) must record any incidents reported by policyholders, and must make this clear to consumers before they submit a claim.
Not upheldApr 2026Decision DRN-6310056
An insurer can settle claims as it sees fit under policy terms permitting it to defend or settle, provided the decision is made reasonably based on appropriate investigation.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6214452
An insurer is entitled to set premiums based on its own assessment of risk, provided the pricing is applied consistently and in line with regulatory requirements.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6313563
An intermediary is not responsible for underwriter pricing decisions, but must provide accurate information about how incidents affect renewal premiums in a timely manner.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6123142
Insurers have commercial discretion to price policies as they wish, provided they do not treat customers differently, and compensation for inconvenience caused by administrative errors should be reasonable in the circumstances.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6105290
Each insurer is entitled to take its own view of risk and set pricing accordingly, provided pricing complies with relevant rules and like-for-like comparisons are made.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6249040
A hire agreement does not confer a contractual right to purchase the vehicle at the end of the term unless explicitly stated in the terms and conditions.
Not upheldLiverpool Victoria Insurance Company Limited
DRN-6278144An insurer may reasonably take previous claims into account when pricing renewal premiums, but must provide accurate information when specifically asked about financial implications of making a claim.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6171519
An insurer may recalculate a renewal premium when a customer reduces coverage mid-term to reflect changes in risk rating, including loss of multi-vehicle discounts, and the ombudsman cannot interfere with how an insurer applies its risk rat
Not upheldDecision DRN-6261977
Under the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012, a consumer must take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation when renewing an insurance policy, and an insurer can avoid the policy if the misrepresentation is
Not upheldAXA PPP Healthcare Limited
DRN-6282015Policy terms clearly specify that cover changes can only be made at renewal and are subject to underwriting criteria and medical restrictions.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6122481
An insurer is not responsible for a third-party insurer's premium pricing decisions, even where the insurer provided incorrect information on a non-binding summary screen.
Not upheldIntact Insurance UK Limited
DRN-6138725Insurers may adjust renewal premiums based on claims inflation and refreshed pricing models without treating consumers unfairly, even when individual risk profiles remain unchanged.
Not upheldAviva Insurance Limited
DRN-5816359Insurers have commercial discretion to assess risk and set premiums based on their own underwriting methodology, and they are not required to disclose commercially sensitive pricing models.
Not upheldU K Insurance Limited trading as Direct Line
DRN-6240357Insurers may adjust premiums based on legitimate underwriting factors including age, claims inflation, and veterinary cost increases, provided pricing is applied consistently and consumers are informed of potential increases.
Not upheldBUPA Insurance Limited
DRN-6130453Insurers may charge different premiums for different policy types (continuing cover vs moratorium policies) provided they treat existing policyholders consistently with their internal guidelines and do not arbitrarily single out individuals
Not upheldIntact Insurance UK Limited
DRN-5867783Insurers have commercial discretion in pricing decisions, and the ombudsman can only assess whether a consumer was treated fairly or less favourably than others, not whether the price itself is reasonable.
Not upheldAXA Insurance UK Plc
DRN-5977492Insurers have discretion to set insurance premiums based on their commercial risk assessment, provided they treat all customers in similar circumstances fairly and consistently.
Not upheld